American foreign policy has greatly shifted since the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001. The U.S. drone program has become by far the most developed in the world.
The Key Stakeholders in this situation are of course Obama and the U.S. government, terrorist organizations like the Taliban and al Qaeda, the civilians living in Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia, Pakistan and the people working in the drone program.
The people of the U.S do not want to see american boots being put on foreign soil. There has been heavy pressure on the government to bring home the troops that were deployed to Afghanistan and the Middle East. With the drone program Obama can keep his men safe while remaining relevant in war on terror.
After the attacks on the twin towers on September 11th, the United States has drastically intensified their war on Terror.
The intention of this drone program is to disassemble Terrorist organizations. Specifically the Taliban, and al Qaeda. The U.S. government believes that these terrorist organizations pose a dangerous threat to the safety and stability of the people in America. One of the most influential reasons that America uses to justify the drone program is that it is by far the most cost effective weapon of war. Hundreds, possibly even thousands, of innocent people are dying as a result to these U.S drone strikes.
We have to care because those who live in these regions of the world are never able to have a moment of peace because accidental death could be upon them at any moment. This is enough to cause a dangerous levels of stress and terror amongst the masses as a result of the uncertainty.
Drone strikes are creating the perfect platform for anti-american and anti-democratic propaganda. When people hear about civilians in their home country being killed at the hands of the United States The destruction from these drones are putting even more stress on these target nations economies. Terrorist organizations like the Taliban or al Qaeda can thrive in struggling environments.
There is most definitely a bias in this article. The drones debate is a very weighted debate. A big reason for this is that the numbers are so poorly documented. Yes, people have been dying in the thousands, but the ratio between high ranking terrorist and innocent civilians is not as disturbing as this article makes it appear. This article focus on the mistakes made by the U.S. drone program and uses words with negative connotation like destroyed.
The Key Stakeholders in this situation are of course Obama and the U.S. government, terrorist organizations like the Taliban and al Qaeda, the civilians living in Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia, Pakistan and the people working in the drone program.
The people of the U.S do not want to see american boots being put on foreign soil. There has been heavy pressure on the government to bring home the troops that were deployed to Afghanistan and the Middle East. With the drone program Obama can keep his men safe while remaining relevant in war on terror.
After the attacks on the twin towers on September 11th, the United States has drastically intensified their war on Terror.
The intention of this drone program is to disassemble Terrorist organizations. Specifically the Taliban, and al Qaeda. The U.S. government believes that these terrorist organizations pose a dangerous threat to the safety and stability of the people in America. One of the most influential reasons that America uses to justify the drone program is that it is by far the most cost effective weapon of war. Hundreds, possibly even thousands, of innocent people are dying as a result to these U.S drone strikes.
We have to care because those who live in these regions of the world are never able to have a moment of peace because accidental death could be upon them at any moment. This is enough to cause a dangerous levels of stress and terror amongst the masses as a result of the uncertainty.
Drone strikes are creating the perfect platform for anti-american and anti-democratic propaganda. When people hear about civilians in their home country being killed at the hands of the United States The destruction from these drones are putting even more stress on these target nations economies. Terrorist organizations like the Taliban or al Qaeda can thrive in struggling environments.
There is most definitely a bias in this article. The drones debate is a very weighted debate. A big reason for this is that the numbers are so poorly documented. Yes, people have been dying in the thousands, but the ratio between high ranking terrorist and innocent civilians is not as disturbing as this article makes it appear. This article focus on the mistakes made by the U.S. drone program and uses words with negative connotation like destroyed.